Digital inclusion: how is it going in Europe?

Inclusion numérique: où en sommes-nous en Europe ?

Inclusion numérique: où en sommes-nous en Europe ?

Les inégalités numériques, qui se réfèrent plus souvent à un phénomène de “fracture numérique”, constituent un obstacle pour celles et ceux qui ont, d’ores et déjà, des difficultés à les utiliser ou qui n’y ont pas accès. Pour combler ces lacunes, les pouvoirs publics agissent à la fois au niveau national et européen, en lien avec les autorités locales. A titre d’exemple, la directive européenne 2018/1972 vient créer la notion de « service d’accès adéquat à l’Internet à haut débit » et donne des critères de définition plus rigides sur la définition d’une connexion Internet. Cette directive vient ensuite être retranscrite dans les droits nationaux des Etats membres, notamment à travers des plans d’action ou un outil équivalent.

Voici des exemples venant de quatre pays de l’Union.

site kit d'inclusion numérique
Vue globale du kit d'inclusion numérique lancé par le gouvernement français
Source: Mission société numérique (screenshot)

En France, un plan national pour un numérique inclusif
L’Etat souhaite détecter les publics en difficulté pour diagnostiquer leurs lacunes en termes numériques. Cela se fait en soutenant le MOOC proposé par la MedNum et le CNFPT “sur les enjeux et bonnes pratiques de la médiation numérique au service de la transition numérique des territoires à destination des agents des collectivités territoriales”.


Les jeunes du service civique sont aussi ciblés, puisque la Ligue de l’Enseignement sera mobilisée pour garantir la qualité des interventions de ces jeunes volontaires. Le but est de sensibiliser au numérique les publics ciblés, et aussi à outiller ces jeunes volontaires.

L’agenda numérique pour l’Espagne et ses quatre objectifs pivots
Accessibilité, alphabétisation, égalité, employabilité. Ce sont les quatre points sur lesquels l’Espagne a décidé d’axer son agenda sur le numérique.
Tout d’abord, ce plan vise à gommer les zones grises du royaume. Ensuite, les plus âgés et les moins qualifiés sont aussi visés dans cette montée en compétences prévue par l’Etat. Par ailleurs, le gouvernement espagnol cherche à combler les différences entre hommes et femmes quant à l’accès au numérique. Enfin, la formation continue est visée, puisque l’Etat cherche à développer les compétences numériques de chacune et chacun au cours de leur vie professionnelle.


Pour réaliser ces objectifs, l’Espagne a pour ambition de garantir un accès Internet à toute sa population et à un débit d’au moins 100Mb/s. Des investissements colossaux à hauteur de 140 millions d’euros seront donc mis en place pour pouvoir faire ce constat d’ici 2025.

cornwall
Deux femmes occupées sur un ordinateur
Source: Gobierno de España
Parlement fédéral belge
Le Palais de la Nation, qui accueille le Parlement fédéral belge
Source: Wikipedia, Palace of the Nation in Brussels

Une Digital Belgium pour combler un fossé numérique
Les autorités belges ont souligné la fracture numérique qui touche surtout certaines tranches d’âge, les personnes les moins diplômées et celles aux revenus les plus modestes. Ces trois degrés de fracture numérique sont à éliminer par plusieurs moyens. Par exemple, l’idée est de renforcer la coopération entre les régions, les communes et l’Etat, tout en impliquant tous les acteurs pour créer une véritable e-inclusion, y compris dans les services publics.
En effet, 10% des ménages belges n’ont toujours pas accès à Internet. L’objectif est donc de garantir l’accès à Internet haut-débit pour toutes et tous, notamment dans les communes rurales de Wallonie.
La stratégie adoptée par la Belgique est aussi de permettre au plus grand nombre d’accéder aux services numériques, que ce soit en rendant les prix du matériel informatique et des abonnements accessibles. En parallèle, le gouvernement souhaite donner la possibilité à chacune et à chacun de monter en compétences, tout en mettant en place des campagnes de sensibilisation visant à souligner les bonnes pratiques. Néanmoins, depuis l’élaboration de ce plan Digital Belgium, le gouvernement fédéral a indiqué vouloir le renforcer rapidement.

Au Portugal, un plan d’action pour la transition numérique
“L'autonomisation numérique des personnes, la transformation numérique des entreprises et la numérisation de l'État” sont au cœur de ce plan lancé en mars 2020 et validé en Conseil des ministres. Dans le cas présent, les différentes stratégies déjà mises en place ou élaborées au Portugal, au niveau local ou national, ont été mises en commun pour créer une véritable synergie nationale. Ainsi, ce plan vise à jongler entre différentes politiques sectorielles pour arriver à une transition numérique effective et inclusive.

A noter l’inspiration estonienne dans ce plan portugais. Un programme de e-Résidence permettra aux résidents portugais établis à l’étranger d’utiliser une version en ligne des services publics. Le pays des Oeillets souhaite, en parallèle à cette mesure, créer un accès en ligne complet aux 25 services publics les plus utilisés.

A travers des approches différentes, les résultats escomptés semblent être les mêmes dans ces différents pays: celui de combler le fossé numérique qui existe dans nos sociétés. Il concerne les publics les plus âgés, les plus modestes et ceux vivant dans des zones rurales. Ces trois groupes constituent la clé de voûte de l’action des pouvoirs publics en la matière, puisqu’ils sont les plus à même d’être en précarité numérique. Entre objectifs ambitieux et fracture numérique aussi grande soit elle, les autorités nationales et locales auront fort à faire pour garantir un accès Internet à chacune et à chacun.

Sources:

– Agence nationale de la cohésion des territoires, Plan national pour un numérique inclusif, 2018

– Conseil central de l’Économie / Centrale Raad voor het Bedrijfsleven, Vers une politique d’inclusion numérique en Belgique, 2020

– Ministro da Economia e Transição Digital, Portugal Digital, 2020

– ePortugal, Governo lança plano de ação para a transição digital, 2020

– Ministerio de asuntos económicos y transformación digital, Plan de inclusión digital y empleabilidad, 2014

G7 Summit: why does the British Southwest matter for the digital sector?

Sommet du G7: Pourquoi le Sud-Ouest britannique est important pour le numérique ?

Sommet du G7: Pourquoi le Sud-Ouest britannique est important pour le numérique ?

Le Sommet du G7 a lieu en ce moment dans la station balnéaire de Carvis Bay, dans les Cornouailles, au Royaume-Uni. Le choix de cette région a été sans doute fait pour montrer sa côte rocailleuse sauvage et le charme bucolique qu’elle inspire. Mais il est réducteur de réduire cette péninsule à cette image caricaturale. Le Sud-Ouest britannique a récemment fait de la green tech son maître-mot, malgré le fait que cette zone soit l’une des moins densément peuplées d’Angleterre.

Voici comment la région a su se convertir dans ce secteur innovant.

G7 leaders
Les chefs d’État des pays du G7 à Carvis Bay, le 11 juin 2021
Source: G7 UK 2021 Flickr Channel

Les Cornouailles, une région rurale et innovante
Seulement 600 000 habitants, des grandes villes avoisinant les 20 000 habitants, et 56% d’une population qui vit en dehors des villes. Sur le papier, les Cornouailles pourraient être vues comme une région très rurale, loin de la vie bouillonnante de Londres. Et pourtant, c’est bien là toute l’erreur que l’on peut faire. Les Cornouailles accueillent de nombreuses organisations innovantes de la Tech, sous des formes là aussi variées. La pandémie a d’autant plus prouvé que le secteur numérique était un pivot pour toute la région. Un peu plus de 4 000 boutiques en ligne ont par exemple ouvert dans tout le Sud-Ouest britannique lors de la crise. Cela est nécessaire dans une région qui repose beaucoup sur le tourisme, mais pas que. La pêche et l’agriculture sont aussi deux secteurs importants de toute l’économie locale. "L'agriculture innove depuis des siècles et on le voit aujourd'hui avec l'émergence des agritech. L'investissement et l'innovation doivent s'accélérer si nous voulons vraiment prospérer économiquement”, affirme Paul Coles, directeur local de British Telecom.

Superfast Cornwall, un projet pour améliorer la vie rurale quotidienne
Comme d’autres pays européens, le Royaume-Uni s’est doté d’un plan pour le déploiement du numérique. 75 millions de livres ont été investies à ce niveau uniquement pour les zones rurales, dont la majeure partie des Cornouailles font partie. Cette action ambitieuse du gouvernement britannique a été de combler aussi une fracture numérique, puisque 17% des zones rurales n'avaient pas accès à Internet à haut débit en 2017. Pire encore, en 2011, une étude a montré que 20% des adultes vivant dans la région n’avaient jamais utilisé Internet.

Face à un tel constat, le projet Superfast Cornwall a été lancé la même année. Financé par le FEDER, British Telecom et les autorités locales des Cornouailles, ce projet vise à casser l’image de désert numérique (digital notspot) qui était donnée à la péninsule.
Pour le mener à bien, la plateforme iCornwall a été créée. Il s’agissait d’un groupe de représentants d’organisations locales, certes diverses, mais ayant un objectif commun: celui d’aider le plus grand nombre grâce aux outils numériques. Néanmoins, les tenants de ce projet ont bien compris que doter le territoire en infrastructures numériques décentes était central. Mais cela est loin d’être suffisant, notamment au regard de la composition sociologique des Cornouailles, où tous les habitants n’ont pas tous eu l’occasion d’utiliser les outils numériques dans leur vie. “Le problème est que la technologie va tellement vite que des gens sont laissés pour compte”, affirme Sandra Coak, employée au centre communautaire de Pendeen, un village côtier près de la ville de Penzance. C’est pour cette raison que des cours de numérique ont été dispensés de manière gratuite aux habitants des communautés locales. Durant plusieurs semaines, ces formations ont pu être suivies dans de nombreuses villes ou villages de la région, surtout par des personnes âgées.

cornwall
St. Agnes Heritage Coast, in Cornwall
Source: Pexels (image libre de droits)
euses OECD conference
Le centre numérique de Pendeen, un petit village près de Penzance
Source: Superfast Cornwall

Ce type d’inclusion numérique va aussi au-delà de la simple formation des publics et de l’installation d’infrastructures efficaces. Les services municipaux, de la mairie à la bibliothèque, se sont transformés en lieux de rencontre numériques. Les habitants peuvent s’y rendre pour avoir accès à un ordinateur, et y faire par exemple des procédures administratives, ou encore l’utiliser à des fins récréatives. L’amélioration de l’accès à internet dans la région a aussi permis d’autres innovations, notamment liées à la santé.

L’Université de Plymouth, située dans une grande ville des Cornouailles du même nom, est très investie sur ces sujets croisés. Des études ont été faites pour voir les effets de la médecine numérique, notamment pour soigner des troubles psychologiques. A titre d’exemple, la e-santé a essayé de soigner les personnes atteintes de démence grâce à la robotique ou par une présence à distance de personnes qualifiées dans ces pathologies.

Entre succès et limites, des infrastructures numériques au service de l’économie locale
La crise sanitaire a aussi poussé la région à revoir son modèle, ou plutôt, à souligner ses réussites. "Si nous voulons vraiment reconstruire l'économie d'une manière qui ait le moins d'impact possible sur notre environnement, nous devons passer par le secteur des technologies", indique Paula Byers, la fondatrice de Digital Northern Devon. Selon elle, les infrastructures numériques qui ont été nettement améliorées - ou tout simplement construites - ont nettement compensé la différence de développement économique qui existait avec d’autres régions de Grande Bretagne. Des entreprises ont pu s’implanter dans le secteur, comme Jurassic Fibre, qui n’aurait pu s’implanter sans les projets d’infrastructures des dix dernières années. Ce dernier vise à fournir “une connexion haut débit de classe mondiale pour 300 000 locaux” d’organisations implantées dans le sud-ouest du pays.

European flags
Localisation des Cornouailles dans le sud-ouest de l'Angleterre
Source: Wikipedia (image libre de droits)

Néanmoins, le choix de développer la fibre optique d’abord dans une région plutôt qu’une autre peut avoir des effets pervers. "Comme le déploiement des chemins de fer au 19e siècle a défini les gagnants et les perdants pour les cent prochaines années, le déploiement des réseaux de fibre optique jusqu'aux locaux fera de même au 21e siècle. Notre intention est que le Sud-Ouest soit l'un des gagnants”. C’est ce que soutient Michael Maltby, le PDG de Jurassic Fibre. Espérons que la fibre ne vienne pas mettre des territoires en concurrence en en laissant certains pour compte. Mais il est certain que les récents projets européens ont donné une valeur ajoutée certaine aux Cornouailles. La légère hausse de la population dans la région est notamment dûe, selon M. Maltby, à l’amélioration certaine de ses infrastructures numériques. En plus de l’image de carte postale que les Cornouailles offrent, elles sont en passe de faire les faveurs des populations des grandes villes alentour, à commencer par Bristol, la grande ville la plus proche avant Londres.

mannheim stadt
Une vue sur Port Isaac (Royaume-Uni), un petit village au nord de Newquay.
Source: Pexels (libre d'utilisation)

Le Royaume-Uni a fait le choix d’aller vers une vision du numérique comme un besoin de base. Mais l’accès à Internet n’est qu’une face d’une même pièce, dont l’autre côté se doit de garantir une compréhension à ces outils. La composition démographique et la répartition géographique de la population des Cornouailles a forcé la région à se tourner vers le numérique pour surmonter des défis. Entre la fracture numérique et l’éloignement d’un grand nombre des grandes villes - et donc d’un accès décent à Internet, la péninsule a su rapidement se convertir en un modèle pour le reste du Royaume-Uni, mais qui reste “largement négligée” au sein de l’Union européenne.

Sources:

– European Network for Rural Development, Cornwall-UK, Steps towards a digital rural region, 2019

– Olivier Vergnault, Hannah Finch, “Why the South West’s tech sector has been a saviour of the Covid-19 crisis”, Business Live, 2020

EU Social Tech Public Affairs Web Review

EU Social Tech Public Affairs Web Review


As the COVID health crisis19 is forcing a large proportion of Europeans to remain at home, Social Economy, Digital inclusion, Democracy defense are more than ever accurate. On such matters, European activity is not slowing down. Here is a panorama on EU Public Affairs news on our subject (Tech x Social) : Digital Service Act, digital ambitions of the German Presidency of the EU, Data Governance Act, European Action Plan for Democracy and ambitions for the ‘next world’.

Digital Service Act : imposing a Tech European model

From Brussels, Thierry Breton, European Commissioner for the Internal Market is fully mobilised on the Digital Services Act: “As part of the European Digital Strategy, the European Commission has announced a Digital Services Act package to strengthen the Single Market for digital services and foster innovation and competitiveness of the European online environment”. The main aim is to reform the Directive on electronic commerce dating from 2000 with regard to the obligations and responsibilities of platforms and to develop the competition rules. It also provides for the regulation of online content, reinforcing the responsibility of intermediaries in the “fight against illegal content and its amplification”. It thus includes the inclusion of online hate in criminal offences at European level. “Platforms must be more responsible and accountable, they must become more transparent. It is time to go beyond self-regulatory measures” says Vera Jourova, European Commissioner for Values and Transparency.

Very clearly, the European Commission’s ambition is to tackle the ‘too big to care’ monopoly, which the Commission believes crushes competition and distorts the smooth functioning of the internal market. The arm wrestling, as we suspected, promises to be tough. Thierry Breton, who wants to take the digital economy out of the “Far West” era, does not hesitate to directly question the bosses of Silicon Valey: “Don’t try to play the smartest game. Pay your taxes if you have to pay them. Don’t resort to tax havens. Pay your taxes,” he told Facebook’s CEO last May, before Google CEO Sundar Pichai apologised in October for his more than aggressive internal lobbying practices. 

The German rotating presidency of the Council of Europe, which ends in December 2020, also makes digital technology one of its major subjects, along with the ecological transition. “In order to stand out internationally as a community of values, we must therefore position ourselves even better on strategic future issues such as climate change, refugees and migration, the rule of law and digital transformation”, said the German Foreign Minister when presenting an ambitious agenda. This also includes the development of a European data and 5G infrastructure and support for research, particularly in the field of artificial intelligence. The Data Governance Act, a regulation on data governance proposed by the European Commission, should thus inflate the pool of data that will feed AI systems and start-ups, and in fine should encourage the emergence of these large sectoral data spaces. 

European Democracy : inclusion of people, social economy and civil society are key

The other major topic of this new school year is Democracy. It is the common thread of the digital regulation carried by Europe. And it is a matter of urgency. On the one hand because the breeding ground for mistrust is becoming more and more fertile, particularly because of social networks. According to a survey carried out by the Jean Jaurès Foundation in February 2019, “one Frenchman in five agreed with at least one conspiracy theory” and “43% of those polled agreed that the government would be in cahoots with the pharmaceutical laboratories to hide the reality of the harmfulness of vaccines”. European politicians are also singing the praises of this questioning of our democratic values. While the European recovery plan was painfully voted through, Hungary and Poland decided to apply their veto refusing “that the payment of Community funds should henceforth be conditional on respect for the rule of law”. One point of consensus, whatever our values: they cannot be bought with billions of euros of aid.

The European action plan for democracy, which has been under the media radar, was the subject of an online consultation this summer. Through the accumulation of new constraints and recommendations for all actors in the democratic game, it must both strengthen the integrity of elections, guarantee media freedom and provide solid strategies against disinformation. It is scheduled for December. 

After the first containment, calls for the “next  world” had bloomed like flowers in the spring. Despite this regulatory activism, the European project is taking a beating. One would have dreamed that European news coverage would be as dense as it was during the American elections. Wishful thinking that fades like leaves in autumn. Yet there are some calls that resonate more than others, such as that of the first European democratic institution: David Sassoli, President of the European Parliament. “We must ensure that the European policies supported by the resources we pool will encourage a transformation of our economies in the years to come, in the service of respect for the environment, social cohesion – which has been particularly affected in the current health context – and the fight against all forms of inequality,David Sassoli declared last September. He also recognised that “Europe needs more than ever to support the voluntary sector” and that “the harmonisation of the single market should not be limited to companies but should also concern the voluntary sector“. In the meantime, a European regulation on participatory financing to protect investors from financial losses will have to be sufficient. 

But those who have the most to lose are ultimately the most precarious among us. What appears to be self-evident takes on even greater prominence in the DESI ranking, which reveals that the digital and economic divides overlap.  In that prospect, Cedric O, French Secretary of state for Digital affairs, just  announced a budget of €250 million (40% EU funding) on inclusive digital on the NEC 2020. 4,000 digital advisers will be recruited by local authorities and associations.

For all these mentioned prospect and because Social Economy and Civil society are both a motor for a more sustainable and prosperous economy for all in Europe, they have to be fully involved in all public policies making. This is also what the European Platform for Philanthropy is calling for









By Nils Pedersen, President of La Fonda Asso and Vice-President of SOGA EU for Public and Academic Affairs


Paris, november 2020


 

EU Digital Policies : Digital Society index, Digital Service Act and more

EU Digital Policies : Digital Society index, Digital Service Act and more

As every trimester, our EU Tech expert Arnaud Castaignet delivers his analysis on the last EU Tech data and policies. From the Digital part of the State of European Union Speech to the last editions of the European Digital Society Index, including the debates on Digital Service Act in Brussels, here is Arnaud’s sum up of what Social Good organisations must retain of the last EU tech news. 

Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, presented on September, 16th to the European Parliament her vision in her first State of the European Union address. Since she got appointed, a strong focus has been made on the EU Green Deal. This speech was the opportunity to highlight the Commission’s other top priority: “Europe’s Digital Decade”. 

Tech and digital will have a great importance in the Next Generation EU fund and will be backed up by 20% investment in digital from it, meaning €150bn of the EU’s €750bn recovery fund will be spent on digital projects. Three focus areas have been identified: industrial data, AI and infrastructure.

Talking about industrial data (as opposed to consumer data) shows that the EC will focus on the development of a data economy, hoping to reap the benefits of the fact the amount of industrial data in the world will quadruple in the next five years. The EC is pushing forward with plans to develop common data spaces hosted on a new cloud platform, GaiaX, in energy and health sectors for instance, and is looking forward to support cooperation between start-ups, companies, SMEs, researchers. When it comes to consumer data, Von der Leyen considers that Europe “has been too slow and is now dependent on others”.

On AI, the President of the European Commission actually pushed new AI governance laws back. When she was elected last November, she promised to introduce AI legislation within the first hundred days of her presidency. During her speech, she mentioned that it would be proposed next year, with “a human-centric approach” to rules and regulation. It is worth noting that she also propose a secure European e-identity, that will allow citizens to use it anywhere in Europe to do anything from paying taxes to renting a bicycle, and will guarantee control over personal data, which may sound similar to principles of Estonia’s e-identity.

Infrastructure investments should also be a strong focus in the road to “Europe’s digital decade”. It is more than needed given that digital divide remains very important in Europe as highlighted in the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI), a composite index that summarises relevant indicators on Europe’s digital performance and tracks the evolution of EU Member States in digital competitiveness. Finland, Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands scored the highest ratings in DESI 2020 and are among the global leaders in digitalisation. These countries are followed by Malta, Ireland and Estonia. Some other countries however still have a long way to go, in terms of infrastructure but also human capital and ability to use Internet services and technologies. Most of them are among the countries with the lowest GDP in the EU (Bulgaria, Romania and Greece, for instance) or strongly affected by Covid19 and its economic consequences (Italy). Therefore, there is a high risk that both digital divide and economic inequalities may deepen. It is worth noting that the biggest countries are not necessarily the most digitally advanced: France is only ranked 15th overall and even 18th when we focus on connectivity, according to DESI index.

The pandemic has exposed the stark reality of Europe’s digital divide. While countries and regions with good internet connections have been able to continue living life with at least a semblance of normality, others have not been so lucky. Of those living in rural areas, 40 per cent still lack access to fast broadband. The investment boost through NextGenerationEU will look to drive expansion to these areas. The investments will be focused on secure connectivity, on the expansion of 5G, 6G and fiber.

This State of the Union speech shows that digital and environmental transitions will be the key priorities of the EU in the coming years and that these transitions are deeply connected. Digitalisation is clearly considered as critical to achieve environmental transition, particularly in urbanism (smart cities), mobility and decarbonisation of the economy and the industry. Again, the main risk is that the same countries might be the winners. Denmark, for instance, is both among the leaders in digitalisation and one of the countries whose smart cities initiatives will help decrease the most carbon emissions. 

Meanwhile, in Brussels, the Digital Services Act Package is the most important text for the EU digital economy that will shake up discussions between the Commission and the Parliament until the end of the year. It is an ambitious arsenal to tackle both the dominance of the digital giants and their policies on moderation. It is being led by Thierry Breton, European Commissioner for the Internal Market. In a recent interview with the newspaper Le Monde, he explains that the regulation of social networks “is intended to be dealt with at the European level”. Many of the measures are based on the French law on confidence in the digital economy (LCEN), which in France governs the same sector. The Digital Services Act also provides that the platforms can identify and locate Internet users posting under a pseudonym “if necessary”. In case of breach, the sites could be financially sanctioned or “be prohibited from accessing the internal market of the European Union”. For the platforms concerned, the calculations would be made according to a threshold of audience “yet to be determined”. The discourse is quite clear, however, and targets sites with “much larger audiences than traditional media, which gives them responsibilities similar to those of an editorial director or content editor”. Apple, Google and Facebook could be put on a “black list” established by the European Union (EU). As reported in the Financial Times, the EU institutions would be developing stricter rules to regulate the digital services market and impose new rules on the biggest players in the market, both in terms of business practices and data sharing and transparency on data collection. large companies to change their business practices. This would include forcing America’s mastodons to share their data and to be more transparent about how they collect it, according to specific criteria.
Discussed in Parliament in week 43, the own-initiative reports by Alex Agius Saliba (S&D) in the Internal Market Committee (Imco), Tiemo Wolken (S&D) for Legal Affairs (Juri) and Kris Peeters (EPP) for Civil Liberties (Libe) were adopted, almost without amendments.

For More Information

The Digital Economy and Society Index – DESI 2020

DESI 2020: Questions and Answers

Country performance in digital

Data Visualisation Tool

DESI 2020 methodology

Digital technologies – actions in response to coronavirus pandemic

Communication on Shaping Europe’s Digital Future

 

 

How EU institutions are preparing Social Economy response? Interview of Denis Stokkink



Denis Stokkink, Board member of SOGA EU, founding president of the Brussels-based European think & do tank POUR LA SOLIDARITÉ-PLS. An economist and lecturer in social economy at the Université Libre de Bruxelles, he is also general rapporteur of the European Commission’s Group of Experts on Social Entrepreneurship (GECES). He gives us a progress report on the current state of play of the European institutions mobilised for the Social Economy and the role of GECES during the Covid crisis.

Can you tell us more about the genesis of GECES (2012-2017) ?

Denis Stokkink : “In its Communication on the “Social Entrepreneurship Initiative” (October 25th, 2011), the European Commission announced the establishment of a “Multi-stakeholder Advisory Group on Social Entrepreneurship” which will review the progress of the measures envisaged by this Communication. (…) this group could be composed of representatives from Member States, local authorities, social entrepreneurship organisations, the banking and financial sector, and the academic world”. 

This group of experts for the Social Economy at the European Commission (GECES) has therefore been set up for 6 years (2012-2017) in order to be consulted by the EU Commission in the framework of the social entrepreneurship initiative and on other issues related to social entrepreneurship and the social and solidarity economy.

The roadmap of this first GECES ended in 2016, with a General Report to the Commission. It listed, inter alia, five positive contributions of the Social Economy to the development of the EU and thirteen recommendations for concrete actions to take full advantage of the potential of social enterprises to address the four main problems faced by social economy actors and social enterprises: a lack of visibility, recognition and identity; difficulties in accessing finance; an inadequate legal framework and a serious lack of European programmes, networks and support mechanisms.”

What is the new GECES roadmap (2017-2023)?

Denis Stokkink : “In 2017, new commitments have been made and are being steered by the Taskforce co-chaired by Ann Branch (DG Employment) and Ulla Engelmann (DG Grow).

The new GECES has seen its members renewed and was constituted with the will to meet regularly the members to discuss the future of HE in Europe. Two subjects are the subject of a more developed consultation: solidarity finance (a report submitted at the end of 2019 will be presented at the European Summit in Mannheim at the end of November 2020) and ecological and social innovation clusters with Hugues Sibille, Denis Stokkink and Ana Umbelino as rapporteurs. A report with 30 good practices published in 2019, new report will also be presented in Mannheim.”  


How did EU Social economy experts respond to the Covid crisis and how do they prepare Mannheim European Summit?

Denis Stokkink : The GECES continues to work actively by exchanging between public and private experts and the European Commission on the possibilities of highlighting SSE. 

The members met on 29 April to share :

  1. Sectoral “Bottum up” initiatives from Social economy and civil society in the territories to respond to the challenges that enable, in particular, precarious populations to propose social innovations in emergency/transitional society situations. For example, DG Grow has worked to reference the social economy initiatives created across Europe on Covid 19 (DG GRow) and to set up a support unit that offers webinars of actors from the European Social Economy community.
  2. The vision and ambitions of European Social Economy actors, taken up by the European Commissioner for Employment Nicolas Schmidt during a speech on Q&A, to help prepare the European Commission’s action plan for the SSE, in the 2nd quarter of 2021. Nicolas Schmit also sent a letter to the national authorities of all EU Member States, stressing the importance of SSE responses in the territories and the importance of significant economic rescue measures directed towards Social Economy actors. All GECES members were enthusiastic about Commissioner Schmidt’s announcement that he is truly committed to giving SSE the means to develop.

    The next meeting of the GECES will take place on 18 June on the preparation of the European Social Economy Summit in Mannheim.

    Data & Philanthropy : how to accelerate impact through partnerships for the Common Good ?

    Last Thursday, May 23rd, we were at the Annual Forum of the European Foundation Center in Paris, an edition that promoted French values under the banner of “Liberty, Equality, Philanthropy…”. The opportunity for the 800 participants representing foundations from all over Europe to discover the specificities and philanthropic commitments of France with the Fondation de France, Fondation La France s’engage , Schneider Electric and Accenture.
    At the end of the day, a central theme for the patronage sector was brilliantly debated. Report and perspectives of this late afternoon on “Data and Philanthropy”, whose central issue was: “How can philanthropy have a systemic, rather than an occasional, impact through data? »
    We, along with Generation2 – Connection Philanthropy collaboration, offer here a sum up of the discussion and concrete illustration from our ecosystem.

    This paper has initially been published in French on Carenews.


    The different uses of data in philanthropy

    Stefaan Verhulst, co-founder and director of research and development at GovLab, introduced the debate with a very precise taxonomy, highlighting how data collection and analysis can help develop philanthropy.

    1. Datas as an asset for philanthropy: Datas can become a useful tool for the continuous improvement of philanthropy, which will allow for better analysis of needs, and adaptation of responses and solutions, as well as improved impact assessment. Wenabi, the first platform to simplify companies’ social commitment, mobilize their employees and effectively measure the impact of the solidarity actions carried out, illustrates this well. This platform also proposes to measure and evaluate the impact of companies, in particular through an integrated reporting tool, in order to monitor all the actions carried out and to measure their impact on employees and beneficiary associations.

    2. Datas as a financing compass: they allow funds to be better directed. For example, philanthropy can invest in the digital transition of the non-profit sector (data ventures). On the condition, of course, that you equip yourself with tools that facilitate the management, analysis and selection of incoming projects. The Optimy tool (Belgium) has made it possible to transform the cumbersome process of calls for foundation projects, which has thus gained in transparency and efficiency. But data sharing between foundations, provided that the GDPR is respected, could go further. In addition, digital technology can lead a prospective action, like chatbots philanthropy advisors, as is the case for the association 30 Million d’Amis, which offers a chatbot providing advice to pet owners in the summer period, in order to limit the risk of abandonment. Another example is Alexa, the Amazon compound, which, for the American Red Nose Day, encouraged people to give, which is a real novelty.

    3. Data as a tool for advocacy and activism: the analysis of global and shared data can also help to develop arguments and lead collective movements. Major online petition platforms such as Change.org et Avaaz have launched the movement, but the media are also beginning to associate storytelling with call to actions, such as Konbini and her latest collaboration with the media France inter around the day “Plastic, no thank you”. According to Stefaan Verhulst, many foundations are investing in this transition, and more and more are using data to guide their strategy.

    4. Data as a political vision: Philanthropy is expected to play an increasing role in the development of public policies regarding data. This is the case of Bayes Impact, which is now campaigning for the establishment of a Citizen Public Service. This initiative has led to the establishment of public/private collaboration in the provision of data that are useful for social innovation projects of citizens who so wish.

    A call for the creation of new institutional forms

    Lucy Bernholz of the Digital Civil Society Lab did not fail to point out the dangers of using data on the four fields mentioned. It is necessary to ask who governs this data and how. One of the solutions mentioned to deal with these dangers involves the creation of new institutional forms that are external to companies but also to governments. “Philanthropy must invest and create these institutions, otherwise they will be invented without us,” warned Lucy Bernholz. Rhodri Davies, Head of Policy and Program Director of the British think tank Giving Thought, predicts that the impact of technology on fundraising will be global, and will change the “where”, the “how” but also the “what” we give. In particular, it highlights a disintermediation of the historical actors, and a move towards “platformisation”, i.e. the growing role of platforms such as Facebook or Instagram in this field. Richard Benjamins, Chief Data Officer of Telefonica, provided an external perspective to the sector. According to him, “to have a real impact on our societies through data, we need sustainable business models.

    Philanthropy is not enough.

    ” It is therefore necessary to question the very foundations of data exploitation. Philanthropy alone will not solve a structural problem, but it must play a role as a catalyst for social innovation, as a venture capitalist with monitoring tools to scale up. The importance of awareness and education on these issues Anne Bouverot, founder of the Abeona Foundation (under the aegis of the Fondation de France) and holder of a doctorate in artificial intelligence, stressed the importance of raising individuals’ awareness of the needs of the nonprofit sector. She sees this as a new role for foundations. The key to development lies in multi-stakeholder collaboration. “If you really want to make a difference, you need to reach a significant number of people. …] It will be difficult for a company to do this on a large scale without it being perceived as a personal interest. » But how can we accelerate this movement?

    One of the ideas developed is to make the talents of companies and students available in probono for companies. The role of education in this process was also highlighted by Anne Bouverot: “We must ensure that we reach the people who will become the future engineers and data coders. » New collaborative tools for managing philanthropy in companies such as the Platform for Solidarity Commitment of microDon, Wenabi or MyCrowdcompany which offers platform-based engagement devices within companies, to allow better management of the efforts of. It is an innovative solution to bring together all the monetary and time donation mechanisms, a single location to understand the solidarity offer proposed by the company and its meaning. This simple and attractive tool makes philanthropy much more accessible in companies, thanks to data. Activism and the proposal of alternative models will also be fundamental to truly include civil society in this area.

    For Lucy Bernholz, the non-profit sector and philanthropy must stand as ramparts protecting the common good, and become essential interlocutors. A question of responsibility To meet today’s major challenges, it is necessary to reinvent current models, explained Lucy Bernholz. In particular, she suggested that the next step should be the establishment of a digital policy agenda. “The British Parliament, American representatives and large companies must commit to sharing their data, it is part of their responsibility. “Democracies are at risk if we do not learn to collaborate and cross-reference the visions of the different actors.

    Thinking about new ways of collaborating with civil society, which are more user-centred, is therefore necessary. A real challenge of democratization and accessibility of data is revealed. For Alberto Alemanno, founder and director of The Good Lobby, the establishment of legal frameworks is essential. He explained that “To permanently unlock privately held data, the private and public sectors must understand each other, harmonize their expectations and ensure that the respective benefits are understood and accessible to all. It is a shared responsibility[…] to share it with as many people as possible, not a minority. » This is one of the objectives of the SDG philanthropy platform, an inter-foundation collaborative model that provides data sharing on philanthropic efforts and data visualization related to the UN Sustainable Development Goals and its 169 “targets”, implemented in 2015 after a major multi-stakeholder consultation to collectively focus efforts on social and climate emergencies.

    Despite the many challenges and obstacles ahead, the session ended on a note of hope. Speakers highlighted a growing sense of responsibility for data and its use: “Increasingly, we are asking about the impact, regardless of algorithms. There is a whole movement to be responsible,” said Richard Benjamin. “There are now leaders in this movement. It is up to European foundations to seize the superpowers of technology to build a virtuous model of collective intelligence around Big Data and artificial intelligence and strengthen the impact and growth of philanthropy in the old continent.